Vikash Kumar Singh @ Soni Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37979 of 2017 (4) dt.01-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37979 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar Singh @ Soni Singh, S/o Radhe Shyam Singh, R/o Village- Mokram, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S.Case No.184 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that later on, on confession of the co-accused he has been arrested and made accused in this case and there is recovery of some cash from possession of the petitioner.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is nothing available on the record to show that the cash is looted one and further the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and now he is in custody for more than 4 1⁄2 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37979 of 2017 (4) dt.01-09-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Bhabhua P.S.Case No.184 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. At the same time, the petitioner is also directed to mark his presence in the police station of his area in the first week of each month till conclusion of trial. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason or to appear in police station for two months, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T