Bachu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47281 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47281 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -394 Year- 2017 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Bachu Kumar Son of Pargas Yadav, R/o Village- Surhni, P.S.- Wazirganj in the District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mithilesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S.Case no.394 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 30ltrs. of mahua liquor from the possession of the petititioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about 1 1⁄2 months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47281 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S.Case No.394 of 2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(iv) If his active participation is found in such type of cases in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U