Akhilesh Rai @ Golia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45514 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -483 Year- 2015 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Akhilesh Rai @ Golia, S/o Nagina Rai, Resident of Village - Tara Dharnaun, P.S. -Patori, District-Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das, Advocates For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2016 in connection with Patori P.S. Case No. 483 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and has renewed his prayer for bail having been rejected earlier by order dated 22.02.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6520 of 2017.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a subsequent development, similarly situated co-accused Deepak Kumar has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 11815 of 2017 vide order dated 26.04.2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody since 10.08.2016, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Patori P.S. Case No. 483 of 2015, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45514 of 2017 (2) dt.04-10-2017 2/2 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T