← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43205/2022dismissed

Sanju Kumari Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43205 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2022 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Sanju Kumari Sinha D/o Ramchandra Prasad @ W/o Bisheshwar Prasad R/o village- Titai, P.S.- Karande, District- Sheikhpura. Presently posted as Block Teacher at Utkramit Middle School, Surari Imamganj, Block- Ramgarh Chowk, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The State of Bihar through Vigilance, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Heard counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Halsi P.S. Case No. 21 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is alleged to have obtained appointment as Block Teacher on the basis of forged and fabricated documents.

It is submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. At the time of appointment, petitioner furnished all the relevant documents and after verification of those documents by the competent authority, petitioner was appointed to the aforesaid post. Petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43205 of 2022(3) dt.08-12-2022 2/2 committed no offence.

However counsel for State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that pursuant to an order passed by High Court, an enquiry was conducted in which the matriculation certificate submitted by the petitioner was found forged and fabricated.

Considering the facts aforesaid and gravity of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T