Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52623 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2020 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== RANJIT YADAV SON OF NAGO YADAV R/O VILLAGE- KARHRA, P.S.- JHAJHA, DIST.- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 23-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case no. 234 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 302, 120B, 448 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, four criminals entered into the house of the informant and they assaulted the wife of the informant by means of rod and also pressed her neck, due to which she died at spot. It is further alleged that there was a love affair between Sunita Devi and Ranjit Yadav and Ruda Devi was the eyewitness of their compromising scene, then they both threatened his wife for dire consequences and informant has alleged that due to apprehension of spreading the news of their illicit relationship, with the help of four criminals, petitioner committed murder of his wife. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52623 of 2021(6) dt.23-06-2022 2/2 On mere suspicion, he has been falsely implicated in this case. No case is made out against the petitioner. The doctor has not found any injury on head. Death was done due to fracture of right shoulder bone and left tibra and fibula bone and hemorrhage and shock. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case no. 234 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U