Vikash And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37166 of 2017 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-135 Year-2017 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ===============================================

1. Vikash, Son of Jagveer Singh, Resident of VillageRivari Khera, P.S.- Bahadurpur Gadh, District- Jhajhar (Hariyana).

2. Param Hansh, Son of Hari Narayan Pandit @ Hari Narayan, Resdient of Village- Gochhi, P.S.- Beri, District- Jhajhar (Hariyana).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s =============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Chandra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari, APP. =============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for offences under Sections 272, 273 and 224 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(A), 38, 41 and 48 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It is contended that as per allegation, 4410 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from the truck which was kept under the packets of pulse of thirty bags which was being boarded by two persons including the petitioner no. 1, Vikash whereas the petitioner no. 2, Param Hansh is said to be the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37166 of 2017(4) dt.25-08-2017 2/2 driver of Hyundai car from which one cartoon of foreign liquor was recovered. Petitioners claim that they are having clean antecedent and are in custody since 26.05.2017. Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2017 with a condition that one of the bailors for each of the petitioners will be the resident of Bihar since the petitioners belong to Haryana. Further, if the petitioners, after their release in this case, are again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Vikash/- U T