Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38391/2017dismissed

Manjeet Chatarjee @ Manjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38391 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2015 Thana -INARWA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Manjeet Chatarjee @ Manjit Kumar Son of Motilal Chaterjee Resident of Village - Barwa Colony, P.S. - Inarwa, District - West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Inarwa P.S.Case no.22 of 2015 , registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the sister-in-law (Sali) of the informant and it further appears from the F.I.R. that she any how fled away from the clutch of the petitioner and thereafter a 'panchayati' was held. The accused persons including the petitioner also assaulted her and tried again to kidnap her.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38391 of 2017 (3) dt.08-09-2017 2/2 such occurrence has taken place. As a matter of fact the petitioner had lodged two cases against the informant and as such the present false and concocted case has been lodged and he is in custody for about five months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of allegation as allegedly in the F.I.R., I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the court concerned after framing of the charge in this case..

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T