← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2576/2019allowed

Madan Kumar Das @ Mandan Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-29Mr. Justice Prakash Chandra Jaiswal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2576 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2019 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Madan Kumar Das @ Mandan Kumar Das Son of Ashok Das Resident of Village- Rambhadrapur, P.S.- Pator O.P., Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga. 2.

Laxman Kumar Son of Ram Nath Sah Resident of Village- Rambhadrapur, P.S.- Pator O.P., Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 29-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Spl. PP for the State.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 23.04.2019 passed by learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge, Darbhanga in Bahadurpur (Pator O.P.) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2019 registered under Sections 366, 511, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 3(1)(x)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. During the course of Panchayati over love affair

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2576 of 2019(3) dt.29-07-2019 2/3 between the daughter of the informant and Vikash Gupta, six Scorpio borne criminals including the appellants descended there and tried to kidnap her daughter brandishing pistol. However, all the accused persons including the appellants were apprehended by the villagers and one loaded country made pistol was recovered from co-accused Subodh Kumar Cahudhary and the accused persons along with seized arms and ammunition were handed over to the police by the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place.

As a matter of fact, appellants have taken part in the Panchayati, but the said Panchayati stood failed due to some differences between two groups of the persons, and as the appellants happen to be associate of Vikash Gupta, they have been falsely implicated in this case by the informant along with his villagers apprehending them and produced before the police. No arms and ammunition has been recovered from the possession of the appellants and moreover the said arms and ammunition was not seized by the police rather were produced before the police by the informant. Parties have entered into compromise in the case. Appellants have no criminal antecedent and have been languishing in custody since 16.03.2019.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2576 of 2019(3) dt.29-07-2019 3/3 Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named appellants are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur (Pator O.P.) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2019.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T