← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52344/2021dismissed

Suraj Kumar Mahto @ Suraj Nuniya v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-18Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52344 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2020 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SURAJ KUMAR MAHTO @ SURAJ NUNIYA Son of Dhanraj Mahto Resident of Village - Teghara, Police station - Manjhi, District - Saran (Chapra) 2.

Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh Yadav son of Ram Bahadur Yadav Resident of Village - Murarakpur Tola Sheodhariya Tola, Police station - Manjhi, District - Saran (Chapra) 3.

Rahul Kumar Yadav @ Rahul Yadav Son of Dinesh Yadav Resident of Village - Murarakpur Tola Sheodhariya Tola, Police station - Manjhi, District - Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-04-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners pray for grant of anticipatory bail in Manjhi P.S. Case No. 190 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code was also added. The victim was given four knife blow by the coaccused Guddu Kumar Ram and the knife used in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52344 of 2021(2) dt.18-04-2022 2/2 occurrence has been recovered from the petitioner. The other accused have also been found involved in the crime and materials have come against them which indicate that they are involved in the crime.

Under the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that this is a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners do not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

The petitioners are directed to surrender within two weeks from today. If they do not surrender within two weeks from today, the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra shall take all proper steps so that they are make to appear in the Court below.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T