← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56727/2018bail granted

Vandana Singh @ Dolly v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-01Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56727 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2018 Thana -MITHANPURA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Vandana Singh @ Dolly D/o Late Ashok Kumar Singh @ Late Ashok Kumar, Permanent R/o vill.- Hadiyabad, P.S.- Charpokhari, DistrictBhojpur, presently R/o Mohalla- Rana Park Siraspur, P.S.- Badali, Delhi42, Delhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Bela Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 231/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 328, 307, 419, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant alleged that accused persons attempted to commit his murder by administering acid in his cold drink. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been found against her. No specific allegation is made against her. No one has suffered any injury. It is family matter and has been resolved. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. She is in custody since 05.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56727 of 2018 (3) dt.01-11-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (East) in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 231/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T