← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49677/2013bail granted

Kuldeep Singh And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-22Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49677 of 2013 Arising Out of Complaint Case No. -187 Year- 2013 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Kuldeep Singh S/O Satya Vir Singh, Director, Micros M Technochem Pvt. Ltd., 674/1, Second Floor, Mahalaxmi Plaza, Shakti Khand- III, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad (U.P)

2. Smt Ekta Singh W/O Sh. Kuldeep Singh 674/1, Second Floor, Mahalaxmi Plaza, Shakti Khand- III, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad ( U.P) .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan For the State : Mr. M.Dayal (App) For the Complainant : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 22-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State . No one has appeared on behalf of the Complainant.

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with complaint case no 187 of 2013 registered under Sections 409, 420 and 120-B of the IPC.

Petitioner no.1 is the Director of the Micros M Technochem Pvt. Ltd. ( for short 'the Firm') whereas the petitioner no.2 is his wife. Allegation precisely is that certain amount was paid for installation of plant which was carried out by the Firm. The same was not up to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49677 of 2013 (12) dt.22-06-2015 2/3 complainant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is purely a business dispute. Considering the facts aforesaid another Director of the Company has been privileged with anticipatory bail vide order dated 30.01.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 26476 of 2014.

Name of the counsel for the complainant appears in the cause list but no one has appeared to oppose the prayer. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzzafarpur in connection with Complaint case no. 187 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors in each case shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioners shall appear in person before

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49677 of 2013 (12) dt.22-06-2015 3/3 the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on three consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T