← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3482/2014dismissed

Sunanda Dhar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-19The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3482 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18207 of 2010 ====================================================== Sunanda Dhar, daughter of late R I Dhar, resident of Mohalla Naya Tola (infront of Labour Court) Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna, Mr. Ram Bujhawan Chaudhary.

3. Ranjit Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, Regional Deputy Director of Education, Muzaffarpur.

4. Sri K. P. Ramayyea son of not known to the petitioner, Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

5. Sri Anupam Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

6. Sri K.K. Sharma, District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

7. Smt. Pushpa Prasad, Acting Principal Rajkiya Chapra Girls High School, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Keeping in view the order already passed in MJC No.1609 of 2011 on 01.12.2011 and in MJC No.2219 of 2013 on 04.12.2013 and the show cause filed by the respondent No.7, no case is made out for initiating any action for contempt. In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in

Patna High Court MJC No.3482 of 2014 (6) dt.19-05-2017 2/2 which his claim has been considered and decided, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same and we are informed by the learned counsel for the respondents by referring to Annexure-B dated 22.08.2012 that this has already been rejected in CWJC No.14419 of 2012. That being so, it is not a fit case where any action for contempt is to be initiated. The application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U