Munchun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47336 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -247 Year- 2013 Thana -DHAKA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Munchun Kumar Singh Son of Lalbabu Singh Resident of VillageChakitwal, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran,. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.
In this application for anticipatory bail the petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 247 of 2013 for the offence punishable under section 387 of the I.P.C. Allegedly, on 14.11.2013 at about 6-15 P.M. an extortion call was made on the mobile number of the informant through mobile no. 7654175639 and the collar demanded Rs. 30,00000/- as ransom by saying himself as founder of Azad Hind Fauz and uttered his name as R.K.Singh. The collar further given threatening that if he does not pay the ransom amount within eleven days he will be shot dead.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47336 of 2016 (2) dt.13-12-2016 2/2 Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report, there is no allegation of tampering with the prosecution evidences, during investigation one of the co-accused has given name of the petitioner on 14.07.2016 after about three years, one co-accused Ramesh Singh has been allowed pre-arrest bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 51196 of 2016 by order dated 05.12.2016 and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner, in case of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of. S.D.J.M. Sikrahna at Dhaka in connection with above mentioned case, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T