← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44317/2023bail granted

Govind Kumar @ Govind Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44317 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Govind Kumar @ Govind Kumar Mahto, Son Of Rajaram Mahto Resident Of Village- Karinga Kothi, Ps- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 338, 307, 353, 504, 506, 120B and 188 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of death of the deceased namely, Chintu Kumar, eight named accused persons including the petitioner and 40 unknown accused armed with lathi, danda and hockey sticks blocked the road and raised slogan against the administration.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44317 of 2023(2) dt.24-08-2023 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the accused persons were protesting the death of Chintu Kumar and were raising slogan against the administration, which was not palatable, as such, they came to be implicated.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P. S. Case No.142 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T