Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41627/2016bail granted

Bablu Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41627 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2014 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ====================================================== Bablu Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav Son of Jagdish Yadav, Resident of Manikura, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2016 in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 134 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusation of assault is against co-accused Uday Yadav and Arbind Yadav. The allegation of taking money from the pocket of the informant is attributed to co-accused Ravi Yadav along with the petitioner, who happens to be the son of the informant is merely ornamental in nature.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 134 of 2014 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41627 of 2016 (2) dt.17-10-2016 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T