Dipankar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44372 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-936 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Dipankar Pandey, son of Late Harish Chandra Pandey, resident of - Kazigaon, P.O. - Kazigaon, P.S.- Raj Mahal, Distt - Sahebganj (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Priyanka Pandey, Wife of Dipankar Pandey, D/o Late Sunil Pandey Resident of Village - Natwar, P.O.- Natwar, P.S.- Natwar, Distt - Rohtas. Bihar, at present Resident of C/o Laldeo Prasad, Diwan Mohalla , P.S.- Khajekala, Distt - Patna.

... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Shashi Shekhar Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498 A, 376, 511, 323, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner, who happens to be husband of the complainant, is said to have tormented the complainant over dowry demand in association of his family members. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioner neither demanded any dowry from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44372 of 2019(5) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 complainant nor tormented her over the said demand. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Moreover, both the parties have settled their differences through the Patna High Court Mediation Center and are now living together. Now, there is no difference between them.

Learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party no.2 turning before the Court frankly conceded the aforesaid fact.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No.936 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) Trivedi/- U T