Raushan Kumar @ Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57974 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -825 Year- 2015 Thana -BETTIAH CITY DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Raushan Kumar @ Golu Kumar son of Sri Gopi Prasad @ Gopi Chandra Prasad, resident of Mohallah- Uttarwari Pokhra, Pakki Fulwari, P.S.- Bettiah Town (Kalibag), District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bettiah Town (Kalibag) P.S.Case No. 825 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147,148, 149, 323, 384, 379 , 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act. As per F.I.R. allegation against the petitioner along with others is of firing on the informant from country made pistol, due to which he succumbed to injury.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his possession and the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57974 of 2018 (3) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Town (Kalibag) P.S.Case No. 825 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T