← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/938/2014dismissed

Ranjay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Department Of Forest And Environment, Govt. Of Bihar And O

2015-03-27Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.938 of 2014 ====================================================== Ranjay Kumar Singh, son of late Brajnandan Prasad Singh, R/o VillageKhutwara, P.S.-Sadar Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Department of Forest and Environment, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chief Conservator Officer, Department of Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Assistant Conservator Officer, Department of Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Divisional Forest Officer, Munger Forest Division, Munger.

6. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai.

7. The Forest Ranger, Lakhisarai Forest Range, Lakhisarai.

8. The Forester, Sighaula, Lakhisarai Forest Range, Lakhisarai.

9. The Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai.

10. Sri Badruddin Khan, Havaldar, T.O.P. Incharge, Bazar Samiti, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Ambastha, AC to AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-03-2015 In this application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.938 of 2014 (2) dt.27-03-2015 2 / 2 order dated 29th April, 2014 passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Munger in Confiscation Case No. 9 of 2010. It would appear from the writ petition itself that the said order is under challenge before the appellate authority. During pendency of the statutory appeal, a writ petition before this Court is not maintainable.

Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T