Kallu Patel @ Rambabu Patel @Kalu Patel @ Rambabu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 49895 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2016 Thana- Bettiah City District- West Champaran ====================================================== Kallu Patel @ Rambabu Patel @ Kalu Patel @ Rambabu S/o Sri Daroga Patel, R/o Vill.- Chargaha, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.
29-08-2018 Heard Sri Umesh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 285 of 2016 registered for offence under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He submits that petitioner was not having any connection either with the group namely 'Royal' or pamphlet/poster, which was found near the gate of the informant. He further submits that some of the accused persons have already been granted bail. Besides hearing, I have also perused the material on record. It is evident that in the case, on the gate of one doctor,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49895 of 2018(3) dt.29-08-2018 2/2 bomb blast had taken place and one pamphlet was affixed there, through which, ransom of Rs. 35,00,000/- (Rupees thirty five lacs) was demanded from informant, who is a doctor. During investigation, petitioner's name transpired. Besides this, on perusal of paragraph - 3 of the petition, it is evident that petitioner is having criminal antecedent and he is accused in at least six other cases, besides the present case, relating to serious offences.
Considering the antecedent as well as nature of accusation, there is no reason to pass favourable order. The prayer for bail stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T