Om Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45033 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2024 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Om Prakash Singh Son Of Nandji Singh @ Nandji Yadav Village- Anua, P.S.- Sahar, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Shantam Shivam, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kachhawa P.S Case No. 03/2024 dated 09.01.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, six unknown miscreants are alleged to have stopped the truck on the point of pistol and they assaulted the informant and took his mobile phone along with Rs. 4,700/-. They also assaulted Manoj Kushwaha and snatched his mobile phone along with Rs. 1,500/- and they fled away with the said truck loaded with paddy.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45033 of 2024(2) dt.16-07-2024 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the self-confessional statement of the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in two other criminal cases which are related to similar nature of offence and the petitioner is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kachhawa P.S Case No. 03/2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T