Satya Nand Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court MJC No.4630 of 2014 (14) dt.23-09-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4630 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16976 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Satya Nand Thakur Son of Late Jagdanand Thakur, resident of Matri Vatika, Ward No.19, Lal Nikunj, Station Road, Madhubani, P.S. Madhubani, District- Madhubani, at present 301, Lalita Nikunj Apartment 'B' Area, Mithapur, Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Mr. Mihir Kumar Singh the Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Rameshwar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr Adesh Titarmare, the Director, Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Anirudh Prasad, the Executive Engineer, Tube- Well Project, Madhubani

5. Mr. Prahlad Prasad Singh, the Executive Engineer, Tube-Well Project, Darbhanga.

6. Mr. Arun Dass, the Project Co Oridinator, Tube- Well, Project, Minor Irrigation, Bihar.

7. Mr. Ram Sukhit Rai, the District Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani.

8. Mr. Suresh Prasad, the Treasury Officer, Madhubani.

9. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Guriya Nisha For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2015 Reply of 4th show cause is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard the parties.

Petitioner raises three grievances. Firstly, grievance of the petitioner is that interest on group insurance scheme of the petitioner was calculated only up to 2004 but actual payment was made to the petitioner in the year 2015. Second grievance of the petitioner is that deduction in respect of GPF/ CPF made from 1973 to 1980 was not properly calculated nor payment of the

Patna High Court MJC No.4630 of 2014 (14) dt.23-09-2015 same was made to the petitioner and third grievance of the petitioner is that deduction made from 1985 to 1989 towards CPF is not tallied with the entry made in the register as well as pass book.

This contempt petition stands disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to raise all the above stated grievances before the competent authority by filing representation within three months from today and if the petitioner does so, the concerned authority must pass reasoned order on the representation of the petitioner within one month from the date of its filing. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) shahid U T