Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37202/2017bail granted

Vinod Rai @ Vinod Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37202 of 2017 (3) dt.01-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37202 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -248 Year- 2013 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Vinod Rai @ Vinod Ray, Son of Late Ramchandra Rai, Resident of Village- Dubha (Rani Khaira), P.S.- Meenapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Meenapur P.S.Case No.248 of 2013, G.R.No.3744 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of dowry death and the petitioner is said to be brother-in-law (Bhainsur) of the deceased.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed against him and the impugned order shows that in several paragraphs of the case diary, it has come that the deceased died due to snake biting. The petitioner is in custody since 8.6.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37202 of 2017 (3) dt.01-09-2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Meenapur P.S.Case No.248 of 2013, G.R.No.3744 of 2013. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T