Virendra Mukhiya @ Birendra Mukhiya @ Brind Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41568 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2019 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Virendra Mukhiya @ Birendra Mukhiya @ Brind Mukhiya S/O Sinehi Mukhiya R/O Vill.- Korahiya, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Kumari Pallavi, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 195 of 2019 dated 13.04.2019 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 272, 273, 120B read with Section 34 of the IPC and u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 180 litres of illicit Nepali country-made liquor was recovered from seven sacks.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Jatan Sahni. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41568 of 2025(2) dt.17-07-2025 2/2 The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 19.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21406/2025. The petitioner has four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 195 of 2019.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T