Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36834/2017bail granted

Pancham Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36834 of 2017 (3) dt.22-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36834 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -54 Year- 2017 Thana -SILAW District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Pancham Kumar Son of Banshi Saw @ Karu Saw, R/o Village- Nanand, P.S.- Silao, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the State : APP For the Informant : Mr. Premchandra Yadav, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2017 in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 54 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. The accusation of having taken away the gold chain is merely ornamental in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 54 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36834 of 2017 (3) dt.22-09-2017 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T