Plan Arch, Through Its Proprietor Namely Jayashree Vinayak Bhojraj v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16087 of 2021 ====================================================== Plan Arch, through its Proprietor namely Jayashree Vinayak Bhojraj Wife of Late Binoy Kumar Resident of Flat No. 352, Gulistan Apartment, Dak Bunglow Road, Behind Hira Place, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Chief Town Planner, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Director, Bihar Urban Development Agency, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Joint Secretary-cum-Assistant Director, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Dalsing Sarai, Samastipur, Bihar. 8.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Rosera, Samastipur, Bihar. 9.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sugauli, East Champaran, Bihar. 10.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh (Asg) For U.O.I.

:

Ms. Kanak Verma, C.G.C.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 20-04-2022 The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to release the admitted outstanding dues for the work done.

This Court had earlier sought for personal appearance

Patna High Court CWJC No.16087 of 2021(4) dt.20-04-2022 2/3 of the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, in a writ petition bearing CWJC No. 16088 of 2021 and a statement was recorded on 9.3.2022. Certain observations were made by this Court. It was also observed that this Court expects all the departments to follow the same pattern as regards payment of admitted dues. Relevant paragraphs of the said order dated 9th of March, 2022,is reproduced hereinbelow:- "We have a bunch of cases where same question is involved regarding harassment caused to the common citizen in making timely payment despite the dues being admitted by the Department.

Mr. Kumar Ravi, Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna is present today before us. He has assured the Court that necessary instructions shall be issued for making it mandatory that admitted dues are paid as soon as it became due, in any case, not later than one month or within the statutory period provided for in the Contract. In case, there is an inordinate delay, the action of the Officer shall be departmentally inquired into, if necessary with the help of the Vigilance Department. In those cases, where the Court imposes interest for delayed payment beyond a particular period, the same shall be deducted from the salary of the Officials

Patna High Court CWJC No.16087 of 2021(4) dt.20-04-2022 3/3 responsible for delay. He, however, assures that a copy of this order shall be handed over to the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. We expect that the same pattern shall be followed in other departments as well.

Personal appearance of Mr. Kumar Ravi, Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna is exempted for the next date of hearing."

In light of the aforesaid order dated 9.3.2022 passed in CWJC No. 16088 of 2021, the present writ petition is also disposed off in similar terms with a direction that the Respondents shall forthwith make payment of the admitted outstanding dues to be paid to the petitioner, in any case, not later than four weeks from today. It is further directed that in case, any claim of the petitioner is disputed or does not find favour with the Respondent authorities, a reasoned order shall be passed within the same time frame and duly communicated to the petitioner. (Rajan Gupta, J) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U