Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46209 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46209 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2017 Thana -GARAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Sandeep Kumar Son of Satya Narayan Mahto, R/o Village- Inayatpur Prabothi, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 119 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 411 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Police arrested the petitioner when petitioner failed to produce the valid papers of the vehicle.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody 24.05.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46209 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 SDJM, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bath P.S. Case No. Goraul P.S. Case No. 119 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T