Md. Kalim @ Abdul Kaleem v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44515 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Md. Kalim @ Abdul Kaleem S/o Md. Irshad @ Irshad R/o Village - Budina Khurd, P.S - Titabi, District - Muzaffarnagar, State - Uttar Pradesh, Pin - 251306 Presently residing at - Ansari Mohalla, P.S - Thana Chowk, District - Supaul, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Md. Abu Bakar S/o Sheikh Mojibur Rahman R/o Mohalla - Ali Nagar, Ward No. 1, Post - Lalbagh, P.S - University, District - Darbhanga, Bihar- 847303 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 27-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges based on suspicion that the Md. Mister kidnapped his minor daughter aged about 16 years.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44515 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted though informant in the FIR alleges that victim is a minor but then she is a major and only to give seriousness to the case, it is alleged that victim is a minor, it is next submitted that victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution, it is also submitted that petitioner and the victim have performed their nikkah.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that he has instruction not the oppose the anticipatory bail application.

6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Darbhanga University P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikram/- T