Amod Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21597 of 2014 ====================================================== Amod Kumar Sinha S/o Late Chandra Shekhar Prasad R/o Diwan Mohalla ( Gurhatta ), Hamam Road, Ram Awatar Pd. Khatri Lane, Patna City, P.S. Khajekala, District - Patna at present posted as head Clerk at Bhagalpur Police Force, Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna
4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, B.M.P., Patna
5. The Inspector General of Police, Patna range Patna
6. The Assistant Inspector General Police ( Welfare ) Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Balak Mahto, AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has been transferred/deputed from Patna district to Bhagalpur district under the orders of Director General cum Inspector General of Police and he has a grievance that since he was a resident of district Patna, his transfer ought to have been made as per the circular of the Director General cum Inspector General of Police dated 19.7.1984 to an adjoining district, this Court, without expressing any opinion, would only give liberty to the petitioner to file representation to the Director General of Police, Patna to examine
Patna High Court CWJC No.21597 of 2014 (2) dt.16-07-2015 such grievance of the petitioner in the light of the circular which on the face of it appears to be directory.
Thus, if the Director General of Police, Patna would find any justifiable reason for changing the place of posting of the petitioner, he will do so and if he does not find any such reason, he may reject the grievance of the petitioner by a speaking order.\ With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U