Hare Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51033 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2018 Thana -DARAUNDA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Hare Ram Yadav S/o Baban Yadav R/o Village Usari Khurd, P.S. - M.H. Nagar, District - Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Daraunda P.S. Case No. 100/2018, registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is recovery of stolen motorcycle from his possession.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He has purchased this motorcycle from coaccused Sandeep Kumar Yadav. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 30.06.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51033 of 2018 (3) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Siwan in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 100/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T