Munnu Singh @ Manoj Singh @ Munna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46227 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46227 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2017 Thana -DARPA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== MUNNU SINGH @ MANOJ SINGH @ MUNNA SINGH son of Late Narayan Singh R/O Sukhlahiya P.S. Darpa, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Patanjali Rishi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Darpa P.S.Case No.39 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 216 ltrs. of liquor.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 20.7.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46227 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge, Excise East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Darpa P.S.Case No.39 of 2017 dated 17.5.2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T