Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44094 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Kumar son of Late Girish Pd. Singh VillageMohanpur Po- Gobraiy Ps-Sojour Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Pratigya Kumari wife of Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Kumar, D/o- Sanjay Kumar Singh Village- Durgapur Ps- Nawada Bajar Dist- banka ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 190 of 2022 dated 09.02.2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 494, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the D.P. Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the complainant mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44094 of 2023(4) dt.10-01-2024 2/3 of demand of Rs. 10 lakh as dowry.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is husband of the complainant. It is further submitted that the petitioner and the co-accused persons neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the complainant. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of "Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182." Learned counsel has further submitted that Section 498A of the IPC is triable by the Magistrate. Learned counsel has further relied on the judgments in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCR 351 and Md. Asfak Alam Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr passed in Criminal Appeal No(s). 2207 of 2023 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 3433 of 2023. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44094 of 2023(4) dt.10-01-2024 3/3 opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Banka in connection with Complaint Case No. 190 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

8. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

9. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Nilmani/- U T