Mukhdeo Yadav @ Mukhu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57158 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -343 Year- 2014 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Mukhdeo Yadav @ Mukhu Yadav S/o Late Badri Yadav, resident of Village- Manjhauli, P.S. Barachati, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Barachati P.S. Case No. 343/2014, instituted for the offence under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged in the written report that daughter of informant was married with this petitioner five years ago. After marriage, she was tortured in her Sasural for demand of Rs. 50,000/- and colour T.V. It is alleged that just one month prior to the occurrence, petitioner had taken the daughter of informant in Bidagri. Thereafter, petitioner along with others assaulted her daughter and pressurized her to bring the amount as demanded by them. It is further alleged that on 27.07.2017, the informant learnt that his daughter has been killed in her Sasural and accused persons
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57158 of 2018 (3) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 are trying to dispose off her dead body. The informant reached the Sasural of her daughter and caught hold the mother-in-law of her daughter whereas other accused persons managed to run away. Case diary has been received in this case.
Learned Additional P.P. has submitted that informant in her further statement in para 7 and other witnesses in para 9 and 10 have supported the prosecution case. Doctor has found several antemortem injuries on the person of deceased caused by hard and blunt substance. It is further submitted that doctor has preserved the visceras. Opinion with regard to cause of death is also kept reserved. Considering the fact that daughter of informant died unnatural death in her Sasursal on account of assault as alleged in the written report and the doctor has also found ante-mortem injuries on different parts of body of deceased caused by hard and blunt substance, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected at this stage. The court below is directed to expedite the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T