Patna High CourtCR. MISC./457/2017disposed

Dilip Sah v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-01-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.457 of 2017 (2) dt.17-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.457 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -533 Year- 2016 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Dilip Sah, Son of Shambhu Sah, Resident of village- Manguraha, Police Station- Shanichari, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Puja Devi, Wife of Dilip Sah and Daughter of Laxman Sah, Presently Residing at Village- Khiriyaghat, Police Station- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Trial No.3129 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506, 341 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner, who is still ready to keep his wife.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the facts that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife, let the petitioner surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.457 of 2017 (2) dt.17-01-2017 before the court below within a period of four weeks and the court below will enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to his satisfaction and will issue notice to the wife of the petitioner and try to settle dispute as the petitioner has stated that he is ready to keep his wife and after meditation and considering the materials, as derived from the mediation, he will pass appropriate order either confirming the provisional bail of the petitioner or any other order as deems fit and proper.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U