Ravi Kumar @ Bhola v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45876 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Bhola S/o Tajnarayan Singh @ Tejnarayan Singh Resident of Village -Chakmjahid (Chak Majahid), ward No 12, PS- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Sweety Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard Mrs. Sweety Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act lodged on 01.05.2025 by the informant, Vivek Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that upon secret information, the Police raided the place and from Ravi Kumar @ Bhola (petitioner herein), there is recovery of 29.47grams of heroin like substance while from Monu Kumar, there is another recovery of 42.87 grams heroin like substance beside the motorcycle. This led to the FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45876 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only because he has criminal antecedent, implicated. He is in custody since 02.05.2025, is a student and the last submission is that the recovered quantity is below the commercial one.
5. Learned APP, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh on the other hand submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. He, however, acknowledges that it is below the commercial quantity of 250 grams.
6. Taking into account the submission of the parties as also the period of custody and the recovered/seized quantity is below the commercial one, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal and Sessions Judge, Vaishali in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025 subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45876 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 3/3 dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for one year to mark his attendance;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T