Pintu Bhokta Singh @ Pintu Bhokta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43911 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Pintu Bhokta Singh @ Pintu Bhokta S/o Chandra Singh Bhokta R/o VillageGariba, P.S.- Rajauli in the district of Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP For the Informant : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 16-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case no.127 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 3(5) and 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the nine named accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed and as a result of old land dispute between the parties, it is stated that the petitioner assaulted the father of the informant with a rod on his head leading to injuries. He was taken to the Sub Divisional hospital for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43911 of 2025(3) dt.16-10-2025 2/3 the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of old land dispute which would be evident from the contents of the FIR itself. It is further submitted in reference to the injury report that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that there is direct allegation against this petitioner of having struck the father of the informant with an iron rod on his head leading to corresponding injuries which have incorrectly been shown to be simple in nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the nature of injury attributable to the petitioner having been found to be simple in nature together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case no.127 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43911 of 2025(3) dt.16-10-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Nawada.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T