Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40542/2020bail granted

Ashok Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40542 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2018 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== ASHOK SAH, SON OF LATE SAHDEO SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGEBARIYAHI, WARD NO. 1, P.S.- BHARGAMA, DISTRICT- ARARIA. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 370/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 401, 413, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, one stolen motorcycle was recovered from the house of this petitioner.

It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. He was not arrested on the spot. House is in possession of joint family. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40542 of 2020(2) dt.09-02-2021 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VI, Supaul, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) rakhi U T