← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59242/2018allowed

Badal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-25Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59242 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== Badal Singh Son of Avtar Singh Resident of Village- Thikriwala, P.S. Satar, District- Barnala Panjab.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 25-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner is in custody in connection with Excise Case No. 194 of 2018 for the offence under sections 8 and 15 of N.D.P.S. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 3.6.2018.

The allegation against this petitioner is that he was involved in carrying 'Doda' like substance which is a narcotic substance.

Manifold submissions have been advanced on behalf of the petitioner to contend that arrest of the petitioner in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59242 of 2018(5) dt.25-01-2019 2/2 instant case is contrary to law. Seizure is also in breach of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

Having regard to the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody 3.6.2018, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gaya, in connection with Excise Case No. 194 of 2018 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall assist in early disposal of the criminal case. In the event, the petitioner is found indulged in delaying practice, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T