Pinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44335 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYA RAIL P.S. District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Pinki Devi W/o Mukesh Sao, R/o Rafiganj Station near water Tanki, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gaya G.R.P.S.Case No.186 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of mobile from the informant and she was apprehended at the spot. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she is lady, having clean antecedent and the dispute arose with respect to sitting in the train that is why falsity of the case appears in this case.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that the petitioner is lady and she is in custody for about three months, let
the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Railway Magistrate, Railway Court, Gaya in connection with Gaya Rail P.S.Case No.186 of 2017 and before releasing the petitioner, the learned trial court will verify the address of the petitioner and the address of the bailor and after being satisfied he will release the petitioner.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make herself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on her part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of her bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T