Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57501/2018dismissed

Om Prakash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-09Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57501 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2018 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Om Prakash Sah, son of Sri Rameshwar Sah, resident of Village- Jaukatiya, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 09-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Majhaulia P.S. Case No.212 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. In the written report, it is alleged that daughter of the informant was married with the petitioner about three years back. She was tortured in her Sasural for demand of dowry and, ultimately, she was killed in her Sasural by the petitioner and other accused persons and dead body was disposed off without informing the informant. It is mentioned in the written report that informant was informed by the accused persons after disposing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57501 of 2018 (3) dt.09-10-2018 2/2 off the dead body that his daughter is sick. When the informant reached her matrimonial house then he found that dead body was already disposed off.

Case diary has been received. Learned APP has submitted that witnesses in the case diary have supported the allegation made in the First Information Report. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected at this stage.

The Court below is directed to expedite the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T