Radha Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.465 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -206 Year- 2015 Thana -WARISNAGAR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Radha Kumari, D/o Mangal Paswan.

2. Laxmi Kumari, D/o Mangal Paswan.

3. Khushbu Kumari, D/o Shiv Nath Paswan.

4. Sunaina Devi, Wife of Shiv Nath Paswan.

5. Meena Devi, Wife of Kameshwar Paswan

6. Meena Devi, Wife of Sita Ram Paswan.

7. Dahauri Devi, Wife of Swieta Paswan.

8. Shobha Devi, Wife of Manu Paswan.

9. Mangal Paswan

10. Raj Kumar Paswan Both are sons of Batahu Paswan

11. Sanjeet Paswan, Son of Mangal Paswan.

12. Kameshwar Paswan, Son of Late Mahesh Paswan.

13. Sulendra Paswan, son of Late Mahesh Paswan.

14. Suresh Paswan, son of Late Jageshwar Paswan.

15. Halindra Paswan @ Harendra Paswan, Son of Sita Ram Paswan.

16. Santosh Paswan, Son of Nunda Paswan.

17. Manu Paswan, Son of Late Mahesh Paswan.

18. Shanti Devi, Wife of Manu Paswan, All resident of Village- Lavhatta, P.S.- Warish Nagar, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in connection Warisnagar PS case no. 206 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under under Section 307, 354 and various sections of Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.465 of 2017 (2) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that petitioners and informant belong to one and same family and case and counter case is pending between the parties regarding land dispute. It is further submitted that there is allegation of assault but there is no specific allegation against any of the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also. Learned A.P.P. could not point out any specific overt act against the petitioner. Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that case and counter case is pending between the parties, the bail application of petitioner is allowed and he is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Warisnagar PS case no. 206 of 2015 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that he will cooperate in the investigation of the case.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T