Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47688/2017rejected

Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-11Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47688 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2015 Thana- DARAUNDHA District- Siwan ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Singh S/o Parsuram Singh R/o Village - Purvi Harsar, P.S. - Daraundha, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyendra Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SMT. ANUSUIYA JAISWAL ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected twice vide order dated 14.03.2016 and 13.11.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1803 of 2016 and 48417 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 16.08.2015, there is no eye witness of the occurrence, in the post mortem report no cut injury was found by the doctor, the trial has not been concluded within nine months and up-till now not even a single prosecution witness has been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47688 of 2017(2) dt.11-10-2017 2/2 informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the informant and other witnesses have seen the petitioner and other co-accused throwing the dead body and further the petitioner has confessed his guilt and on the basis of his confession Khurpi used in the crime was also recovered.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of the prayer of bail, again his such prayer stands rejected.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U