Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43255/2026bail granted

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-02Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43255 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2026 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Son of Ram Uday Rai @ Ram Uday Ray R/O village- Raichiahi, Rachiahi, (Rachiyahi), Purana Tola, ward no. 9, P.S. Matihani, District- Begusarai 2.

Ankit Kumar Son of Ajit Rai @ Ajit Kumar R/O village- Raichiahi, Rachiahi, (Rachiyahi), Purana Tola, ward no. 9, P.S. Matihani, DistrictBegusarai 3.

Ankesh Kumar Son of Ajit Rai @ Ajit Kumar R/O village- Raichiahi, Rachiahi, (Rachiyahi), Purana Tola, ward no. 9, P.S. Matihani, DistrictBegusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners seek regular bail in the present case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 76 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the victim, causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that there is general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners of assaulting the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43255 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 2/2 victim. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have clean antecedent and they are in custody since 25.04.2026. The petitioners undertake to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Begusarai/concerned Court below in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T