Virendra Paswan @ Virendra Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40711 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2022 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Virendra Paswan @ Virendra Bhagat, S/o Anurag Paswan @ Anurag Bhagat, R/o Village- Fatehpur Nayakapari, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali 2.
Ajit Paswan @ Ajit Kumar, S/o Late Shivnath Paswan @ Bindeshwar Bhagat, R/o Village- Fatehpur Nayakapari, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Heard Mr. Shivjee Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Satyendra Prasad, learned APP for the State.
2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 263 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons have demanded cycle of the informant and when he objected it is alleged that Manoj Paswan assaulted with dab on the head of the informant, Bhullu Paswan assaulted with danda
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40711 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/3 and Ajit Paswan assaulted with iron rod.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. From the perusal of the F.I.R. main thrust of allegation is against Manoj Paswan. There is no specific allegation against Virendra Paswan. Ajit Paswan is having allegation of assaulting the informant with iron rod. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that the nature of injury is simple caused by hard and blunt substance. Petitioners are having no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and submitted that the injury is on the vital part.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the fact that though the injury is on the vital part but there is only one single blow, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 263 of 2022, they will be enlarged on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40711 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 3/3 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-15, Vaishali, Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T