Ram Bharosa Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52428 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2021 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== RAM BHAROSA BHAGAT S/o UCHHA BHAGAT R/o VILLAGE MERAHI, P.S-M.H. NAGAR, DISTRICT-SIWAN.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Daraunda (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 161 of 2021 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is named in the first information report. Petitioner has criminal antecedent. Further he contended that petitioner is the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52428 of 2021(2) dt.08-04-2022 2/2 owner of the alleged poultry farm from where the illicit liquor has been recovered. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission advanced on behalf of the learned counsel for the State, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

shailendra/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T