Shrideo Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43549 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2022 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

SHRIDEO CHAUDHARY Son of Jay Prakash Chaudhary Resident of Village - Marar, P.S.- Rahika, Distt.- Madhubani. 2.

Nitya Nand Chudhary Son of Ramadhar Chaudhary Resident of Village - Marar, P.S.- Rahika, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147,145,149,341,323,307,354(B),379,448,427 and 504 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have clean antecedent. They have falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submits that the present case is counter blast of Rahika P.S.Case No.56 of 2022 filed by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43549 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/3 the petitioners against the informant and others. Further submits that the allegation of assault is against co-accused namely Rishi Kumar, Rajo Devi and Manisha Devi. Further submits that the injury report (Annexure-2) reveals that injury of the aforesaid injured persons are found simple in nature and both the parties are agnates and there is admitted land dispute. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No.57 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43549 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 3/3 reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T