← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50379/2017dismissed

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-08Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50379 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -475 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/o Sandhir Rai, R/o Village- Lal Pekhar Dighi, P.S.- Hajipur, Sadar, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No.475 of 2016 registered under Sections 399, 402, 414, 467, 420, 472 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B) a, 26II and 35 of the Arms Act as well as under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Earlier prayer of bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide Annexure-1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner renews the prayer of bail of the petitioner on the ground that another co-accused Vikram Kumar has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.46553 of 2017 on 11.10.2017. It is also submitted that one prosecution witness has been examined out of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50379 of 2017 (3) dt.08-11-2017 2 /2 five.

However, this petitioner has got criminal antecedent of four cases of serious nature, so the Court is not inclined to grant him bail at this stage. The prayer of bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Town P.S. Case No.475 of 2016, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it preferably within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of this order. If the trial is not concluded by that time, the petitioner may renew his prayer of bail. (Arun Kumar, J.) S.Kumar/- U T