Vijay Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16876 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Vijay Kumar Jha, Son of Late Dinesh Jha, Resident of Village & P.O.: Bhakharain, Police Station: Madhepur, District: Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

7. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jhanjharpur, Madhubnai.

8. The Circle Officer, Madhepur Circle, Madhubani.

9. The Block Development Officer, Madhepur, Madhubani.

10. The Officer-in-Charge, Madhepur Police Station, Madhubani.

11. Satya Narayan Agrawal, Son of Late Kusheshwar Prasad Agrawal.

12. Sanjay Rai, son of Late Ganga Rai.

13. Bechan Purvey, Son of Late Kari Purvey. Sl. No. 11 to 13 all resident of Village: Madhepur, P.S. Madhepur, District: Madhubani. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafulla Chandra Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-6 For B.S.F.C. Mr. Raju Giri, Adv. For R. Nos.11 to 13 Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-09-2016 Heard Mr. Prafulla Chandra Jha, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No.6, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Heard also Mr. Raju Giri, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Bihar State Food Corporation, and Mr. Avinash Kumar, learned Counsel,

Patna High Court CWJC No.16876 of 2015 (3) dt.19-09-2016 2/2 appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.11 to 13. In view of the fact that a proceeding, under Section 145 Cr.P.C., has already been drawn with regard to the land, which forms the subject-matter of this Public Interest Litigation, this writ petition is hereby closed with liberty given to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) K.C.jha/- U