Pampi Rai @ Babloo Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41711 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Pampi Rai @ Babloo Rai S/O Mogal Rai @ Mugal Ray R/O Vill.- Jan Tola, P.s.- Revilganj, Dist.- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 352 read with Section 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused person are alleged to have abused, assaulted and fired on the informant due to which he sustained gunshot injury on his chest. The petitioner and the co-accused persons along with 20-25 unknown persons also entered the house of the room
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41711 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/3 of Arun Mahto and started assaulting them and due to that Munni Devi became injured. It is further alleged that 14 used cartridges were also recovered from the place of occurrence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the injured sustained injury which is simple in nature. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has five criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in all cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2025. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 14.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28456 of 2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41711 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 3/3 concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shivam/- U T