Sunil Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48755 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -344 Year- 2016 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Sunil Bind Son of Late Suresh Bind Resident of village- Malhipur, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody since 29.09.2016 in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S.Case no. 344 of 2016 registered under Sections 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for more than a year and his name has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused made before the police, let, above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Miss. Sweta Grewal, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S.Case No. 344 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48755 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar offences till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) that the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(iv) that the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) singh/- U T