Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46397 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- UPHARA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Bablu Kumar Son of Nand Kumar Singh R/O Village- Gorkatti, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Uphara P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 132, 324(2), 324(3) and 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons aggressively behaved with the official, tore the uniform of policeman and prevented them from discharging their duties and also damaged the glass of JCB when they reached the disputed site to remove the encroachment as per the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Daudnagar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46397 of 2025(2) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature and no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that no policemen have received any injury and even no accused persons including the petitioner have made any protest. The petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Uphara P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T